Editor's Picks + Features

800px-Habitat67July2010

Montreal’s Best Architecture Psychoanalyzed

Special contributor Justin Boulanger, architecture...

4814694220_7da9ea9331

World Wide Wednesday: Maps, Trains, Trikes and Three Million on the A40

Each week we will be focusing on blogs from around...

1389468625_e47df0f3d7

La construction de la nouvelle Plaza Swatow : une histoire de 2007 à 2010

Septembre 2007 Mai 2008 Mars 2009 Mai 2009 Décembre...

4535824501_36bd0676c6

To renew or not to renew

Je ne sais pas quoi faire. Renouveler ou ne pas renouveler...

4870294341_dd20b0b02d_z

Églises converties du Québec (suite)

Intérieur de l'église Sainte-Françoise-Romaine aujourd'hui...

4813590841_9f648eb1cb

Photo du jour : Riverview

Riverview Avenue, in Westmount, located just north...

4877446872_8c6c346101

The death of a climbing tree

I came home from a weekend of camping to learn that...

City Hall Update: Campaign Expenses

hotel-de-ville

Yesterday the 2009 municipal campaign expense reports were made public by the DGEQ. Here are the total expenses of the three main Montreal parties:

  • - Union Montréal: $1.5 million
  • - Vision Montréal: $1.4 million
  • - Projet Montréal: $245,000

When one compares with amount of money spent with the amount of votes received for each party's mayoral candidate, here's the dollar per vote breakdown:

  • - Union Montréal: $9.35 per vote
  • - Vision Montréal: $10 per vote
  • - Projet Montréal: $2.30 per vote

What is most noticeable is the huge difference between Projet Montréal and the two larger parties. Simply put, Projet Montréal spent way less money than the other parties and got a lot more bang for their buck. This speaks volumes of the dissatisfaction that a large chunk of the electorate felt towards the two big parties. Even with a major funding (and therefore advertising and voter contact) handicap the party was still able to see a large amount of support materialize on election day.

Also of note is that fact that Vision was largely able to keep up with Union in terms of expenditures. Gérald Tremblay had a number of key fundraising advantages going into the campaign such as incumbency, the support of the business community, and a large network of sitting councillors with their accompanying lists of contacts. In the aftermath of the election some commentators credited Tremblay's reelection to his party's superior get out the vote machine. These numbers would imply that Harel was on a more level playing field.

As per electoral regulations 50% of these expenses will be reimbursed by the City. This will leave a total bill of around $1.6 million.

Projet Montréal has posted their report on their website, available here.

 

Comments

Neither the author nor Spacing necessarily agree with the comments posted below. Spacing reserves the right to edit or delete comments entirely. See our Comment Policy.

There is a communication lesson to be learned in these results. With far less money than the two other parties, Projet Montréal was able to win 25% of the vote using traditional media but social media as well. Remember Luc Ferrandez circulating through the Plateau with his bicycle and PowerPoint presentation. Proof that with imagination, one can achieve great results.

 
Post a comment
City Hall Update: Campaign Expenses
By Devin Alfaro






Advertise with Spacing
Spacing Store
Where to Buy Spacing Magazine