Editor's Picks + Features

800px-Habitat67July2010

Montreal’s Best Architecture Psychoanalyzed

Special contributor Justin Boulanger, architecture...

4814694220_7da9ea9331

World Wide Wednesday: Maps, Trains, Trikes and Three Million on the A40

Each week we will be focusing on blogs from around...

1389468625_e47df0f3d7

La construction de la nouvelle Plaza Swatow : une histoire de 2007 à 2010

Septembre 2007 Mai 2008 Mars 2009 Mai 2009 Décembre...

4535824501_36bd0676c6

To renew or not to renew

Je ne sais pas quoi faire. Renouveler ou ne pas renouveler...

4870294341_dd20b0b02d_z

Églises converties du Québec (suite)

Intérieur de l'église Sainte-Françoise-Romaine aujourd'hui...

4813590841_9f648eb1cb

Photo du jour : Riverview

Riverview Avenue, in Westmount, located just north...

4877446872_8c6c346101

The death of a climbing tree

I came home from a weekend of camping to learn that...

Save the Main


A feature interview with Eric Paradis, organizer of Save the Main, about the city of Montreal's plan for Boulevard Saint-Laurent.

 

Comments

Neither the author nor Spacing necessarily agree with the comments posted below. Spacing reserves the right to edit or delete comments entirely. See our Comment Policy.

You go girls... err... guys!

Another ridiculous project proposal that completely dismisses Montreal's nature as a lively alternative and artful city. We already have hundreds of office buildings with coffee shops on the ground floor. Do we REALLY need one more? We only have ONE Café Cléo, and that my friends is irreplaceable.

I feel that Tremblay is a purist at heart, if this place was anything else than a transvestite/fetish showbar, he'd be the first one to lobby for preservation of Montreal's cultural heritage. And then maybe not. But I'm sure this doesn't play in the Main's favor as it stands.

Ugh, this is so frustrating. Sign the petition!

http://savethemain.com/intro.htm

Comment by Denis
December 12, 2009 | 11:29 pm

"The great divide" this two solitude business is a bit of an archaic stereotype....

Comment by Adrien
December 13, 2009 | 11:42 am

I dunno, the only compelling argument that I've heard from the Save the Main supporters is that which comes from the queer community: that Café Cléopatra represents a very important lieu of personal transformation and self-affirmation.

but, M. Paradis calling this area an important 'cultural pole,' and comparisons with Greenwich village and such is ridiculous. I used to work in the area: it's crack houses and hotel/bordellos as far as the eye can see (except of course for the Insta-check and the crappy computer parts store).

And the MTL pool Room, sadly, is NOT as it once was, rather a pale shade.

I'm almost always on the side of the small guy, but this time, the 'small guy' has no case.

Renewal is needed.

The Main has to be helped but shoving in more corporate development is not the answer. The place can't stop having meaning for Montrealers for it would be a huge loss. Just east down the road is the Gay Village, one of the most successful rejuvenations of a neighborhood on the planet! To the west is the new entertainment district. The city just doesn't have a clue how to connect the dots. Let's not forget that the Tremblay administration simply has not demonstrated any realistic understanding of this city, it's culture, it's history, and it's neighborhoods with any of the mega projects they have lusted after.

The video is very informative and I didn't really know there was such a "Moulin Rouge" character to the Cafe Cleopatra. Really. Worth. Saving.

That the Main is not considered a historic district and one that is landmarked is beyond my comprehension. If Hydro needs new office space, there is a huge parking lot behind its tower and plenty of empty lots around Clark. There is no need for this scope of a project in this place. Why not just build new in between the Monument Nationale and Cleopatra.. it's called infill development. This tendency to destroy entire city blocks for one project is a bit dated and makes for a boring urban fabric.

Comment by Edward
December 13, 2009 | 5:56 pm

@Edward, it actually is "protected" as a historic district. Everything close to the Monument National falls under a special "aire de protection du Monument ÉNational et de son caractère". Even the proposed 2-22 buildng falls under it. The current administration just made it go through anyways.

Comment by morcego
December 13, 2009 | 10:58 pm

This section of the main is so disgusting! Something needs to be done there. I don't know if this project is the solution but something need to be done NOW.

Comment by TheMontrealGuy
December 14, 2009 | 5:13 pm

The interesting thing about this strip is that is seedy and rough around the edges. There is no need to go an bulldoze it entire block to spruce it up. Investments made around the neighborhood and via infill development will do that organically.

... and Greenwich Village WAS like this many moons ago. Look at it now. How about some nice 10 storey apartment buildings in the area? With retail at the ground floor. That would do a lot more to improve the area than jamming a Hydro-Quebec head office annex on Ste Catherine and St Laurent.

Comment by Edward
December 15, 2009 | 1:12 pm

The lack of any vision in this city for the past 30 years is why I chose to leave in 1988. I came back about 6 years ago for family reasons. I look forward to leaving again. There IS life beyond Montreal, cities where there is democracy and vision...dying here.

Comment by Larry Pinell
January 6, 2010 | 3:56 am
 
Post a comment
Save the Main
By Adam Bemma






Advertise with Spacing
Spacing Store
Where to Buy Spacing Magazine