Comments on: IPAM sets the stage for more inclusive long-term planning http://spacingmontreal.ca/2009/11/13/ipam-sets-the-stage-for-more-inclusive-long-term-planning/ Mon, 21 May 2012 15:01:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Maria Gatti http://spacingmontreal.ca/2009/11/13/ipam-sets-the-stage-for-more-inclusive-long-term-planning/comment-page-1/#comment-13218 Maria Gatti Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:06:59 +0000 http://spacingmontreal.ca/?p=4739#comment-13218 Well, I don't know Bumbaru personally, and perhaps he is not a team player. But he almost always has been right in terms of Montréal's architecture and development, and the ghastly errors made (see Bell Centre below on this blog). In any case, this is an excellent initiative, including the opportunity for community association inputs. Let's hope it can achieve something. Well, I don't know Bumbaru personally, and perhaps he is not a team player. But he almost always has been right in terms of Montréal's architecture and development, and the ghastly errors made (see Bell Centre below on this blog).

In any case, this is an excellent initiative, including the opportunity for community association inputs. Let's hope it can achieve something.

]]> By: Neath http://spacingmontreal.ca/2009/11/13/ipam-sets-the-stage-for-more-inclusive-long-term-planning/comment-page-1/#comment-13212 Neath Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:08:53 +0000 http://spacingmontreal.ca/?p=4739#comment-13212 Excellent thing! It took 8 years of Tremblay for the need to become absurdly obvious. Excellent thing! It took 8 years of Tremblay for the need to become absurdly obvious.

]]> By: Martin Girard http://spacingmontreal.ca/2009/11/13/ipam-sets-the-stage-for-more-inclusive-long-term-planning/comment-page-1/#comment-13210 Martin Girard Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:54:32 +0000 http://spacingmontreal.ca/?p=4739#comment-13210 Bumbaru is not interrested in what people think; he only wants us to know what HE thinks. And of course, he's totaly sure to be right all the time about everything concerning Montreal' architecture and development. I'm tired of its righteousness. Lambert is much more open minded and imaginative in her vision of Montreal's future. Bumbaru is not interrested in what people think; he only wants us to know what HE thinks. And of course, he's totaly sure to be right all the time about everything concerning Montreal' architecture and development. I'm tired of its righteousness.

Lambert is much more open minded and imaginative in her vision of Montreal's future.

]]>