Editor's Picks + Features

800px-Habitat67July2010

Montreal’s Best Architecture Psychoanalyzed

Special contributor Justin Boulanger, architecture...

4814694220_7da9ea9331

World Wide Wednesday: Maps, Trains, Trikes and Three Million on the A40

Each week we will be focusing on blogs from around...

1389468625_e47df0f3d7

La construction de la nouvelle Plaza Swatow : une histoire de 2007 à 2010

Septembre 2007 Mai 2008 Mars 2009 Mai 2009 Décembre...

4535824501_36bd0676c6

To renew or not to renew

Je ne sais pas quoi faire. Renouveler ou ne pas renouveler...

4870294341_dd20b0b02d_z

Églises converties du Québec (suite)

Intérieur de l'église Sainte-Françoise-Romaine aujourd'hui...

4813590841_9f648eb1cb

Photo du jour : Riverview

Riverview Avenue, in Westmount, located just north...

4877446872_8c6c346101

The death of a climbing tree

I came home from a weekend of camping to learn that...

Photo du Jour : City Seeks Superhero

We need a superhero

Photo taken October 21st on Guy, just above de Maisonneuve.

Also, Fagstein launches an adult conversation about municipal corruption and calls for an Everything Inquiry.

 

Comments

Neither the author nor Spacing necessarily agree with the comments posted below. Spacing reserves the right to edit or delete comments entirely. See our Comment Policy.

I've often wondered: isn't it a crime to cover a mailbox with a poster or otherwise deface it? Is anyone ever prosecuted for it? Of course, mailboxes have long been the focus of various kinds of protest, even on the part of postal workers themselves, but I wonder how many other countries tolerate this as a matter of course.

Comment by Patrick Coleman
October 22, 2009 | 11:21 pm

It is illegal to poster mailboxes or any public property, but its the kind of law that gets applied sporadically. In a case like this, there's no info to track down (and fine) the responsible party, so i doubt anything would be done.

See this post by Christopher DeWolf for more info:
http://spacingmontreal.ca/2007/11/01/we-need-more-legal-space-for-postering/

In that article, he notes that the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in 1993 that prohibiting all postering violates freedom of expression.

BTW, the same rules would technically apply to missing pet posters and signs for garage sales...

Lachine (and possibly TMR) is the most tightassed about that. I've routinely seen them remove even the sandwich-board signs which are up for 3 hours on a Sunday showing where an open house is.

Comment by Marc
October 23, 2009 | 6:12 pm

Given what things are like right now, sometimes the law needs to be broken. It's a great poster. I hope that there's another one on the way for Harel.

Comment by Fidel Fuentes
October 23, 2009 | 8:44 pm

Isn't this illegal anyway as it's in English-only? Remember that language called French they spoke here once?

In this case, I would be inclined to say that the culprit is Photoshop… :) :) :) :) :)

Comment by jean.naimard
October 23, 2009 | 11:16 pm

NEUmontréal - No, that only applies to commercial signs.

Comment by Monica
October 24, 2009 | 10:49 am

LOL... pas sûr que la Loi 101 s'applique aux graffitis... mais je crois que c'est différent en Ontario:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6p_6wvByFg

-X

Comment by Xavier
October 24, 2009 | 2:18 pm

So, my comment was that mean to montréalais that you needed to delete it ? I note that Fidel Fuentes made quite the same assertion than me... I must admit, though, that mine was a bit more sarcastic. French people are like that ;-)

 
Post a comment
Photo du Jour : City Seeks Superhero
By Alanah Heffez






Advertise with Spacing
Spacing Store
Where to Buy Spacing Magazine